Everymans car. The Chevy Impala/Caprice.



The Chevrolet Impala/Caprice.



The workhorse of the everyman, the city, state, Federal government and every cab driver for a span of 50 years and a car most of the public are surely familiar with...

Either you’ve ridden in one as a Taxicab or you’ve been pulled over by one (or if you’re really unlucky) a ride in a police cruiser, its one of the most successful US models finding its way to 13 Million Dads, Moms and Mr. Average Joes driving them to work, school, or grocery store.

The Chevy Impala/Caprice is the longest running & still in production, model of any US passenger car.

Only the Corvette sports car (introduced in 1953), and Ford F-series truck (1948), can claim a longer continuous production history.

Surprisingly, the first introduction of the nameplate “Impala” was heavily related to the Corvette. The Impala, a GM Motorama show car, based on a Corvette chassis was shown to the public in 1956.



1956 Impala Motorama Show Car



Essentially a four seat Corvette from the futuristic design studios of Harley Earl. Perhaps a nod to Ford and the upcoming four-seat Thunderbird, giving notice that Chevy could play that game too…but the design would never see the light of day.



1958 Bel Air Impala Bel Air vs Impala tail light treatment



Jump to 1958, the restyled big Chevy and the Impala was offered as a sporty, luxury trim option on the Bel Air. Though the Impala was very similar in shape/style to the Bel Air, the three pod/placed taillights that would soon become the trademark for Chevy and Impala/Caprice appeared here.



By 1959, the upscale trim options became so popular, the Impala evolved to its own model line. A new daring shape was needed for the new model. And so Harley Earl, his reign at GM waning, the 1959 Impala/Caprice became his last personal project.



Studio ideation sketches of the '59 Chevy/'59 Chevy clay mock ups



And what a design it was. Under Earl, tail fins had already grown to an outlandish extent, yet the '59 went in a different way. The ‘58 had already started a Chevy trend of slightly canted tailfins, but the ‘59, it stretched them to a flowing seagull-like appendage. The three pod taillights gone, replaced with almond shaped, “cat-eye” taillights following the contour of the gull shaped fins.

There were big changes here, the Impala models having a panoramic rear window mimicking the front wraparound windshield. Two-pod headlights, introduced high and above the bumper in ‘58, were now much lower and integrated with the grille. And the grille, departing from convention, was split in two. A conventional grill spread side to side with headlights at each end, and above, two separate "nostrils" with turn signals at each side.

'59 Chevy Impala front end

Even with the radical gull-wing fins, the overall appearance, compared to ‘58 (or many cars of the day) was lower, cleaner and leaner than before. It was obvious that Bill Mitchell, groomed by Earl to be the next chief of GM design, influences was showing through.



'59 Impala sedan & sport coupe



What might seem like nothing to a modern day observer, the ‘59 was quite a radical departure for what was supposed to be a conservative company selling cars to the “everyman” market. It was popular however, and modern looking, though maybe too much so for some.

It was the butt of jokes, and complaints of high interior heat, due to the great new expanse of glass introduced on this car, were raised.



Rumors persist to this day of rear end lift caused by the "gull" wings at highways speeds.

The wings, cats-eye lights, and overall appearance were off putting to some, but still, it sold well. Even so, GM/Chevy management didn’t like controversy (the bad smell of Ford’s very expensive flop, the Edsel, was still blowing in the wind), they weren’t happy, and wanted a change.



1960 Bel Air

So, the 1960 Impala was a fairly major conservative redo, the gull wings were flattened, and the three pod rear tail lights re-appeared and replaced the cat eyes. As the fins were less emphasized, a large jet emblem was placed on the rear quarter panel to compensate and strengthen the last gasp of the “jet-forward” theme that had been the hallmark for all of Harley Earl’s designs dating back to the late 40’s.



1961 clay mock up/1962 Impala SS

1961 further brought the space age/jet theme down to the earth and saw the roof line conform to a more formal, square cornered look. The Impala “B-body” re-style now was more in line with the trim and neatly pressed style of now chief of design, Bill Mitchell.

Mitchell’s comments on Earl and their difference in design philosophy…

“He had a tendency to make fat, rounded heavy things. I think it was because he was a big man. I like sharp, razor edges in contrast to his rounded deals. When they threw the reins over to me, it didn't take me long to get back into a sheer look.”

Creased lines replaced the past bulbous shapes and the fins or gull wings had become just vestiges of their former glory. A “bubble-back” roof line and rear glass was featured as the “floating top” disappeared and a “B” pillar-less convertible-like hardtop roof became standard in the 2 door/sport coupe and few four door models.



Despite the many drastic design changes the Impala had gone through, a model only 3 years old, sales remained strong and steadily increased throughout the 60’s. Chevrolet made sure the car was popular with an abundant amount of options and engine choices, the Impala stayed popular because it could be customized to the individual buyers’ needs or wants. Along with traditional good looks, it was a combination that kept the car in the top of US sales for more than a decade.

1964 Impala convertible

It’s important to understand the challenge of having to design a fresh look for the countries most popular car and ensure that look fits with the “everyman”, average Joe image Chevy claimed its cars to be. The Impala had to meet the needs of the public, fleet/rental/taxi markets, law enforcement requirements and not cross an imaginary line of non-conformity. The difficulty of styling a car that needs to be everything to everyone, be basic and simple, yet overall new, good looking and customizable for those who want or demand something more, is incredibly ominous. Yet the Chevrolet styling staff managed to do that, and even hit home runs doing so, three times in ’63, 65 & ‘67.

1965 Impala SS

With the now classic styling of the ‘63 & ‘65 Impala and the introduction of the hi-performance 427 and the Super Sport (the legendary SS, previously offered in 1962), the Impala solidified its place in the American car industry as a leader in value, comfort and performance, and the public was buying. 1965 marked the year that the Caprice (an upscale luxury option with a formal non-fastback roofline only) was introduced on the Impala, and one million Impalas rolled off the line and into the hands of the buying public and fleet that year, a record unsurpassed by an American car model to this day.



1967 Impala fastback coupe

1967 marked an obvious and successful effort in transplanting the “coke bottle” shape on to the Impala with great results.

By 1971 another fresh look was due, and the B-body was once again reborn, this time it was to be the largest full size car ever produced by Chevrolet.

Impala/Caprices sales continued strong, but now the Impala was now the downmarket entry level car, and the Caprice the top of the line. For 1972 a new handsome split bumper/gaping grille was introduced, partly due to increasing federal standards, requiring larger body protection.



1972 Caprice

But there was trouble brewing, the coming of the fuel embargo of 1973, increasing safety requirements, rising fuel costs and growing emissions concerns. The heyday of large American cars with large fuel gulping V8's was coming to an end. The writing was on the wall, the B-body Impala/Caprice had to be downsized to meet the growing need for a more efficient smaller full size car.

In 1973 Project 77 was implemented at GM, targeting the economizing of the entire full size car line. B-body’s from Chevy to Cadillac were going under the knife for major reductions in size and weight.

At this time Bill Mitchell, his reign as VP of design at GM coming to an end, took an unusual step from behind his committee design chair, and assumed a large part of the 1977 re-design personally.

Project 77 was a huge investment program for GM, with over $600 million spent towards an 600 lb decrease in weight and 10 inch reduction in length. Mitchell, the most capable of achieving the goals of Project 77, showed he was still able to apply themes of sharp creased edges and balanced proportions to the redesign.



Considering the parameters, Mitchell paired down the car to bare essentials in shape, yet managed to bring out a strong, basic look of refinement and style that normally would've been found on upper-class, more expensive cars. With squared off ends, near slab sided body and slight folded edges, the Chevy long before considered a “commoner” car, achieved an almost stately look. Mitchell, known for his battles over the rear window treatment of the ’63 Stingray, and the infamous boatail Rivera, managed to push through a unique three paned and frameless window treatment for the two door coupe Impala/Caprice as a final statement.



1977 Impala/'77 Caprice coupe three window coupe

Immediately sales rose to near 1960’s figures. It was named car of the year by Motor Trend and factory shifts went into overtime to keep up with demand. Even with a reduction in power and choices in engines/drivetrains, it was seen as a major step forward for GM and Chevy, and the public responded.

The redesigned B-body Caprice/Impala sold very well and essentially went on for another 13 years without major changes, excepting minor front and rear end updates.



The platform was extensively redesigned in 1991 and returned to a more organic and rounded design reminiscent of some of Harley Earl’s designs of the ‘50’s.

Unfortunately, the design was not a welcome one and landed with a resounding thud with the public. The car was quickly accepted by rental fleets, taxicab owners, and law enforcement, but the public was left cold and a sales slump reflected that.



1992 Caprice/1996 Impala SS

Fortunately, Jon Moss of GM skunkworks, managed to resurrect the Impala SS nameplate, and with some creative and needed design tweaks, plus a Corvette engine, gave the car a much needed boost in both performance and style. Easily one of the fastest and most sought after cars of the last decade, the Impala SS lived up to its SS moniker and heritage.



But the fun was only short lived, and by 1996 the Impala SS (at least in RWD form) bowed out of the GM line up.

In 2000 the Impala name was resurrected, but as a FWD sedan. Many of the past styling cues of the Impala were used, but in a much more subdued effect. Styling here was less than inspired, the nameplate being resurrected to supplement the less than loyal following of the Chevy Lumina.

2002 Impala

Yet luckily, and most likely due to the legacy of the Impala/Caprice, a genuine small block V8 and SS version was added back to the lineup in 2006.

2008 Impala

The Impala is still on sale today, and despite the many accolades of its new modern mid-size sister, the Malibu has gained recently, Chevrolet still, very quietly, sells three Impalas, for every two Malibus they move. A testament to the model lines history and tradition.



A new Caprice is in the works, and is guaranteed a great future due to this nameplates legacy.

The Impala/Caprice, a favorite of movie directors/stunt drivers, police departments, taxi drivers and the American public for its simple but reliable tradition.



When people talk about a real American classic car, this is it.

-gumbypiz

Nice Design, Shame about the car...

We've all had one of these at some time. Sharp sporty cars for their time, that for whatever reasons, bad engineering, poor management, or just bad luck in the stars didn't turn out to be what we thought they would be. Attractive cars that were plentiful and common to see just a few years ago, and now have virtually vanished from our roadways. Automobiles that were once modern and stylish to us then, but wouldn't necessarily want to be driving today.

The Dodge Intrepid

The Intrepid started out as a genuine gee whiz prototype built on a Lamborghini chassis. In the late 80's Chrysler designer, Kevin Verduyn, begin work on the Najao, as a replacement for the aging K-car based Dynasty. Initially the concept wasn't seen as feasible. The design had many elements of the "cab forward" design that would be the hallmark of the LH platform (Intrepid, Chrysler Concorde, & Eagle Vision). Extending of the windshield/A-pillars out & over the drive front wheels and the stretching of the rear (providing more interior room) was evident, but the feasibility and mechanics were not working out, smaller engine compartment size issues (required for the cab forward design)were proving to be engineering headaches.

Along comes the fortunate bankruptcy of Lamborghini for Chrysler, who bought up the famous Italian supercar maker. With that the Najao design was revived and with a stretched chassis of a Jalpa, the Portofino, a Lamborghini running prototype developed by Chryslers Pacifica studios, became the spark of life to the Intrepid.
Chrysler's Lamborghini Portofino was the Intrepids inspiration.
Built on a stretched Jalapa chassis
.

The Portofino was a stunning show car, and a great platform for working out the engineering issues of the cab forward design. From there Tom Gale, Chrysler vice president of Product Design, and John Herlitz, Chrysler's director of Exterior Passenger Car Design, ran the design right to the production studios.


Intrepid styling buck Intrepid ESX show car

The Intrepid was a smart looking car, borrowing many cues from the prototype (but not the flip up doors) and all the integral bits of the cab forward philosophy. Initially the LH cab forward platform cars sold very well, the design being a genuine step forward from the tired K-car based designs of the past.
ESX concept

Unfortunately, quality and build issues, excessive sludge build up and other engine problems with the standard 2.7 V6, requiring costly repairs, and in some cases engine replacement, killed most of the momentum the cars had with buyers. Even with a fresh, quite skillful and attractive restyle in 1998 the cars never attained the sales forecast Mopar wanted. Today its a sketchy used buy, and already starting to disappear from the roadways due to disrepair. The car was discontinued to make way for the hugely popular new LH rear drive cars like the 300C.


The Isuzu Impulse

What could have been the 2nd generation Scirocco for VW became the Isuzu Impulse (Piazza outside the US). The legendary Giorgetto Giugiaro and his design company Italdesign had penned the original Golf and Scirocco and was expected to be contracted for the follow up. After a exhaustive design study, VW went with their own in-house design with Karmann, and Isuzu was more than thrilled to have the fifth Giugiaro "Copernican revolution", the Asso di Fiori (Ace of Clubs prototype) as their own. Elements of car design we now take for granted, flush glass, complete absence of drip/rain gutters and door/shut lines extending to and into the roofline (in the style of limousine doors) were all introduced on a sporty, crisply designed 2+2 coupe in Geneva 1979.

Giugiaro's Asso di Fiori (Ace of Clubs) Piazza show car
Crowds gathered around the display stand in awe, Giugiaro's common themes of tight crisp lines melding with rounded end shapes were very prominent and very popular. Rumors were abound that this was going to be the next 2+2 introductory Lotus. The car and design certainly looked the part.

Mouths dropped when it was revealed that this was going to be a common production car for little known Isuzu. Jaws dropped further when it was known that the car was designed to meet the specifications of the Gemini 1800 (Japanese version of the Chevy Chevette chassis). Thoughts of such a great looking breakthrough design running on what was essentially a mild rehash of the failed Vega platform left many in the industry scratching their heads.

Despite the chassis, the Impulse initially sold well, assuredly due to its stunning good looks and design. Most of the industry magazines gave it great marks, and the Impulse won awards for the its design, but only so-so praise for the anemic 4 cyl. The handling of course left much to be desired working from Chevette underpinnings. By the time the ruse was reveled, that the Impulse was a very attractive paperweight without the power or footing to get out of its own way, sales for its enthusiast target market virtually disappeared. By the time Isuzu realized the problem and returned with a decent car, a turbo version with chassis tuning by Lotus, it was too late to save it.
It’s a shame to see the few cars of these on the road beaten up and abused; it was once a show stopping, award winning design.

The Pontiac Fiero
Pontiac Fiero SE & GT V6
GM’s second only 2 seat production car, and its only mid engine one has a history dating back to the 50’s with the Motorama show car two-seat Bonneville Special, the Club de Mer, heavily based on the new Corvette.
1956 Pontiac Club de Mer

By the mid 60’s Pontiac’s chief John Z. DeLorean (father of the GTO) campaigned heavily for a Pontiac two seat sports car, the Banshee. The Banshee, was a two seat hardtop, resembling much of the soon to be 68 Stingray in both shape and style. Though the design was very attractive, GM execs, understandably, killed the idea for fear of it competing with the Corvette. A second show only car, a mild rendition of the Banshee, appropriately named the Fiero, with a daring open targa style top proved popular but was never planned to make the public roadways.


1964 Pontiac Banshee & 1969 Pontiac Fiero
Come the late 1970’s, Pontiac, still committed to make a two seat sports car, set up plans to present GM with a proposal. A prototype, the “P”-car, was rushed to the Advanced Three design studio. Under designers heads Ron Hill w/John Cafaro, the car was designed to use plastic body panels above and below the center body line. This strong body line, giving a strong forward leaning wedge shape, became the major design theme running the length of the vehicle, rising slowly towards the rear end. Along with purposely large wheel openings, retracting headlights (but no front grille) the mid engine design was a strong and exciting prospect.

A running prototype was built and the final exterior design was moved to John Schinella in Pontiac studios where more specific Pontiac design identity cues, split bumper pads in the traditional Pontiac theme was added and the theme body line was made a rub strip running the entire length of the car.

The P-cars wedge-shaped, mid-engine design was a hit with GM executives, but at the time of rising gas prices, inflation and fuel shortages, the 14th floor at GM could only be convinced to commit to budget for a 2-seat “commuter car”, not a full on sports car. A large part of the Fieros future fate and problems were sealed from that change of focus.

A change to commuters car from sports car meant that to make budget and design specifications the Fiero turned into a GM shelf parts car. To save costs, development for engineering was farmed out to Entech , and to meet a greatly reduced budget and streamline the tooling process, parts were raided from GM parts bin, the front suspension modified from a Chevette, the noisy and rough Iron Duke motor and a rear engine setup modified from a front drive X car platform was used.

The debut was praised by the industry, and sold well, but the legacy of the shelf parts used, along with initial teething problems for a new model (engine fires, cooling and electrical problems) soon changed sales figures. The Fiero was great to look at, but was underpowered and disappointed those expecting a sportier ride to go along with its fresh looks. Slowly GM corrected problems, adding a stronger more powerful V-6 , reworking the rear suspension for proper sports car handling and in 1986 restyling it with a much more coherent and flowing “flying buttress” fastback design. But as it always seems for the General, and revisiting the fate of the Corvair, by the time they got the Fiero “right” GM killed it, just before the Fiero really got its chance to spread its wings and fly. Fieros are seen less and less on the road today and will probably become tomorrows collector’s items.
-gumbypiz.

Lipstick On a Pig: The Chevy Vega



The Chevy Vega.



The Vega conjurers up memories of noisy motors, warped blocks, high oil consumption, engine fires, early rust/rust prone panel, poor build quality, production plant sabotage & strikes, the list goes on…Who of us didn’t either own or know someone that owned one back then, they were all over the place. Even my Dad bought a LEMON yellow ’74 that year . Nowadays it’s more common to see a Bentley or Ferrari on the road than a Vega.



A quick Google search will find the car in many Top or 10 worst car lists, and maybe rightfully so given its inception and background. But it wasn’t because it was a bad looking car.



Code named XP-887, the Vega started as then GM President, Ed Cole’s pet project. The XP-887 or Vega 2300 was to be Chevys next modern small compact car, a fresh slate after the missteps of the Corvair.

The Vega was GM first attempt at a small car after the Corvair



The first ideas for the car was as a rear engine rotary, but the bad taste of a rear engine Corvair still in its mouth and serious issues with rotary development (NSU’s nightmares with the Ro 80 as an example) nixed those ideas.

Ed Cole Father of the Vega



Ed Cole championed a new all aluminum block impregnated with silicone in the cylinders instead of iron cylinder sleeves (as was standard practice). And as both Chief engineer and company president, no one could, or was going to convince him (the father of the small block Chevy V-8) of this inherent flawed engine design. So Cole was going to get his way, no matter what.



This was the beginning of “committee design” at the General, and Cole quickly set up committees for both engineering and styling as well. As John Z. DeLorean (of the infamous DMC/stainless-steel car fame and head of Chevy at the time) described, it was a car that was "14th floor engineered " (from the GM building), committee engineered by groups of big-wig executives out of touch with the reality of building a durable car. A project with an engine none of GM engineers supported, and a car Chevrolet didn’t want either, it was forced upon them.



As far back as 1969, two years before its introduction, at its introduction to GM executives, it’s said that the front end of the prototype literally fell off. So the Vega already had some bad karma working for it from the start, all manners of GM executives were walking away from it and its future did not look bright.



So, what do you do with the redheaded child that no one wants, but still have to sell to the public?

You put your best lipstick on a pig, that’s what you do, and that’s what GM did.



A lot of pressure was going on the looks of this car, and the design committee for the styling of the new car was made of legendary names in auto design. Bill Mitchell, Chuck Jordan, Irv Rybicki and Dave Holls were all on board. So they had the talent to hold the pig down, so to speak. The first proposals for the car were contemporary enough, clean pressed “suit” lines that were typical of the Mitchell era, but its front/nose and back were bland. Initially the car had been thought of short wheelbase one, as more of a Nova no frills utilitarian-type and got some uninspired styling to go with that theme.

The XP883 & XP887



But the first of problems for John DeLorean to tackle when he came to Chevy was to revitalize and generate some genuine enthusiasm within his division for the project. By motivating Fisher Body to work with Chevy chief designer Hank Haga, they worked a miracle in modifying the fresh face of the new Haga designed 2nd generation Camaro F body design cues onto the Vega.

The Camaro’s long smooth nose wide Ferrari egg crate grille and slightly protruding fender headlights influenced from the Facel Vega, are very must present in the Vega. Chevy’s traditional rear pod taillights treatment, typical for the Camaro and the Corvette were stylized an added to the slightly contoured rear of the Vega as well.

Strong hints of Ferrari are seen in both the Camaro & Vega



The Vega was a one of GM’s first of the new vent windowless design, and adding to the more sporting style DeLorean was looking for Haga added functional vents, placed on the deck and at the rear quarter posts.

Styling wise, this little car from Chevy was a good looker, magazines and press all gave the cars overall slightly Italian influenced design thumbs up. Now, no one is going to ever call the Vega a stunningly beautiful automobile, but considering the offerings at the time, the clownish Gremlin, the staid, almost homely Maverick styled Pinto, the Vega was the most handsome of the bunch, hands down.

Vega GT's rolling off the Lordstown, OH plant



Particularly the Vega GT (about 30% of all Vegas sold) and the rare Cosworth Vega looked pretty good for their day, keeping in mind that blow out afros, dashikis, tie-die shirts, Tab, and leisure suits were also popular….

Though the overall result of the Vega was a public relations disaster for GM, and legions of customers probably never returning to a Chevy lot, overall, Chevy sold nearly 2.2 million of these cars, not too bad for a 6.5 year span. By the time the writing was on the wall about the cars troubles, Chevy still moved over 460,000 Vegas in 1974! It was a popular choice, and Chevy kept in pace with the updating of the Camaro, the Vega too incorporating much of the new updates of Camaro too throughout its lifespan.



It’s a tribute to John DeLorean's management skills, Bill Mitchell’s design influence, and the styling genius of Mr. Haga, that the Vega made its way as far and as long as it did. One of the few reasons for the continued strong sales of this car until its last two years.



The Vega is a great example of excellent exterior styling propping up poor or lazy engineering and development. It’s not the first time this has been the case, and certainly won’t be the last.

Lipstick on a pig indeed.